Opinion
5:08-CV-119 (FJS/VEB).
December 27, 2010
OLINSKY SHURTLIFF, HOWARD D. OLINSKY, ESQ., Syracuse, New York, Attorneys for Plaintiff.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF REGIONAL, COUNSEL, REGION II MARIA P. FRAGASSI SANTANGELO, ESQ., New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendant.
ORDER
When a party does not object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews that report and recommendation for clear error or manifest injustice. See Linares v. Mahunik, No. 9:05-CV-625, 2009 WL 3165660, *10 (N.D.N.Y. July 16, 2009) (citation and footnote omitted). After conducting this review, "the Court may `accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the . . . recommendations made by the magistrate judge.'" Id. (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)).
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Bianchini's November 4, 2010 Report and Recommendation for clear error and manifest injustice; and, finding none, the Court hereby
ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Bianchini's November 4, 2010 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further
ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; and the Court further
ORDERS that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and the Court further
ORDERS that Defendant's decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Bianchini's November 4, 2010 Report and Recommendation; and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 27, 2010 Syracuse, New York