Opinion
No. 37647.
Filed February 19, 1971.
Divorce: Trial: Dismissal and Nonsuit. Dismissal of the petition of a wife for divorce where, at the trial on cross-examination into extra-marital sexual relations by her, she successfully asserted the privilege against self-incrimination, is correct.
Appeal from the district court for Platte County: C. THOMAS WHITE, Judge. Affirmed.
Snell Winkle, for appellant.
Robak Geshell, for appellee.
Heard before WHITE, C.J., CARTER, SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN, and NEWTON, JJ.
The district court at the close of all the evidence dismissed the petition of plaintiff wife for a divorce. She appeals.
At the trial plaintiff on cross-examination into extramarital sexual relations by her successfully asserted the privilege against self-incrimination.
Dismissal of the petition of a wife for divorce where, at the trial on cross-examination into extra-marital sexual relations by her, she successfully asserted the privilege against self-incrimination, is correct. The ruling represents an application of the equitable maxim of "clean hands" to a divorce suit. See, Stockham v. Stockham (Fla., 1964), 168 So.2d 320, 4 A.L.R. 3d 539; Christenson v. Christenson, 281 Minn. 507, 162 N.W.2d 194 (1968); Franklin v. Franklin, 365 Mo. 442, 283 S.W.2d 483 (1955).
The judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.