From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schowachert v. Santoro

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 25, 2021
1:21-cv-00947 GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00947 GSA (PC)

06-25-2021

JOHN PAUL FRANK SCHOWACHERT, Plaintiff, v. KELLEY SANTORO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, toget her with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was deficient because it did not include plaintiff's required original signature. Each document submitted for filing must include the original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule 131; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall re-submit the enclosed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with plaintiff's original signature, or in the alternative, pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action.

Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schowachert v. Santoro

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 25, 2021
1:21-cv-00947 GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Schowachert v. Santoro

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PAUL FRANK SCHOWACHERT, Plaintiff, v. KELLEY SANTORO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 25, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00947 GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)