From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schott v. Trinity Health-Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 20, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-12468-VAR-MAR (E.D. Mich. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-12468-VAR-MAR

03-20-2012

JANETTE SCHOTT Plaintiff, v. TRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN d/b/a ST. JOSEPH MERCY PORT HURON, a domestic non-profit corporation, Defendant.

Rex A. Burgess (P42779 Attorney for Plaintiff David B. Gunsberg (P24235) Attorney for Defendant


Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

Magistrate Mark A. Randon


ORDER WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

The Court having reviewed the pleadings filed by the parties and heard oral arguments, Orders as follows:

1. With respect to document production request number 10, Defendant shall supplement its response to provide that the personnel file of Natalia Cwalina contains no disciplinary action, no application, no resume and no performance reviews. Plaintiff's motion is otherwise denied.
2. With respect to document request number 11, Defendant shall supplement its response to confirm that all correspondence requested has been provided, there are no further emails other than those provided, and MOV emails are deleted within 22 days and are not retrievable. Plaintiff's motion is otherwise denied.
3. With respect to document request number 16, Defendant will provide applications, resumes, and all disciplinary actions for Julie Angel and Sue Bacik which occurred for the period one-year prior to Plaintiff's termination date. Plaintiff's motion is otherwise denied.
4. With respect to document request number 19, Defendant will amend its response to provide that Defendant does not have "error reports" for the year 2009 as requested in Plaintiff's document request number 19. Plaintiff's motion is otherwise denied.
5. With respect to interrogatory number 16, Defendant will provide supplemental responses indicating for each employee requested the position held, date of termination and whether the individual was terminated due to errors committed in the medical lab. Plaintiff's motion is otherwise denied.

Supplemental responses and documents corresponding thereto will be provided by Defendant within 10 days of entry of this Order.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the attorneys and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on March 29, 2012.

______________

MARK A. RANDON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Melody R. Miles

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon

(313) 234-5542

Approved as to form and content:

______________

Rex A. Burgess (P42779

Attorney for Plaintiff

______________

David B. Gunsberg (P24235)

Attorney for Defendant


Summaries of

Schott v. Trinity Health-Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 20, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-12468-VAR-MAR (E.D. Mich. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Schott v. Trinity Health-Michigan

Case Details

Full title:JANETTE SCHOTT Plaintiff, v. TRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN d/b/a ST. JOSEPH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-12468-VAR-MAR (E.D. Mich. Mar. 20, 2012)