From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schott v. Township

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 16, 2022
Civil Action 22-230 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-230

08-16-2022

ARTHUR SCHOTT, JR., Plaintiff, v. UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP and UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP PFC FRED C. RHODES, JR. #38, Defendants.


ORDER

GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

AND NOW, this 16th day of August 2022, upon consideration of Arthur Schott Jr.'s Amended Complaint (ECF 10), Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF 12, 13), Schott's Responses (ECF 16, 17) and Fred Rhodes Jr.'s Reply (ECF 18), it is ORDERED:

1. Rhodes's Motion (ECF 13) is DENIED.

2. Upper Chichester Township's Motion (ECF 12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Schott's failure to train claim against the Township is DISMISSED without prejudice. Schott may, consistent with the Court's Memorandum, amend this claim on or before Tuesday, August 30, 2022, or it will be dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Schott v. Township

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 16, 2022
Civil Action 22-230 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Schott v. Township

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR SCHOTT, JR., Plaintiff, v. UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP and UPPER…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 16, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-230 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2022)