From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoonover v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 1, 1999

Appeal from Order of Yates County Court, Falvey, J. — Notice of Claim.


Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum:

Because the record does not establish plaintiff's consent, the appeal cannot be perfected on a "statement in lieu of stenographic transcript" (see, CPLR 5527; City of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Rochester Stor. Warehouse, 142 A.D.2d 957).

Were the appeal properly before us, we would conclude that substantial justice was done in this small claims action (see, Coppola v. Kandey Co., 236 A.D.2d 871). We reject the contention that expert testimony was necessary to sustain plaintiff's claim (see, UJCA 1804; Siegel, N Y Prac § 582, at 918 [2d ed]).

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, WISNER, SCUDDER AND BALIO, JJ.


Summaries of

Schoonover v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Schoonover v. Gardner

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT R. SCHOONOVER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. D. DOUGLAS GARDNER, D.D.S.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 742