From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scholz v. Epstein

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 15, 2020
335 Conn. 943 (Conn. 2020)

Opinion

09-15-2020

Stephen W. SCHOLZ v. Juda J. EPSTEIN

Jonathan J. Klein, in support of the petition. Daniel J. Krisch, Hartford, Joshua M. Auxier and Stephen P. Fogerty, Westport, in opposition.


Jonathan J. Klein, in support of the petition.

Daniel J. Krisch, Hartford, Joshua M. Auxier and Stephen P. Fogerty, Westport, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 198 Conn. App. 197, 232 A.3d 1155 (AC 42419), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the defendant attorney enjoyed absolute immunity from the plaintiff's claim of statutory theft, arising from the defendant's conduct during prior judicial proceedings?"


Summaries of

Scholz v. Epstein

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 15, 2020
335 Conn. 943 (Conn. 2020)
Case details for

Scholz v. Epstein

Case Details

Full title:Stephen W. SCHOLZ v. Juda J. EPSTEIN

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 15, 2020

Citations

335 Conn. 943 (Conn. 2020)
237 A.3d 2

Citing Cases

Scholz v. Epstein

The plaintiff then petitioned this court for certification to appeal, which we granted, limited to the…