From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scholtes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 3, 2010
27 So. 3d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 4D07-3690.

February 3, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Lucy Chernow Brown, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-10198CFA02.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, and Raymond Scholtes, Crestview, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, Appellant's pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant's right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 493 (1967).

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scholtes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 3, 2010
27 So. 3d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Scholtes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Raymond SCHOLTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

27 So. 3d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Ruiz v. State

It is well established that an affirmance of a direct appeal on an unpreserved issue does not bar a defendant…