From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scholes v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 16, 2012
84 So. 3d 379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 5D11–3512.

03-16-2012

William Gilmore SCHOLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition of Adkins.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scholes v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 16, 2012
84 So. 3d 379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Scholes v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM GILMORE SCHOLES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

84 So. 3d 379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)