Opinion
No. 116768/06.
November 19, 2007.
Parties — Standing"Alleged heir did not have standing to pursue claim for restitution of Picasso painting that was sold under duress during Nazi regime.
No. 116768/06.
November 19, 2007.
Parties — Standing"Alleged heir did not have standing to pursue claim for restitution of Picasso painting that was sold under duress during Nazi regime.
Full title:JULIUS H. SCHOEPS, Plaintiff, v. THE ANDREW LLOYD WEBBER ART FOUNDATION…
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
Date published: Nov 19, 2007
The order granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint and denied plaintiffs motion for leave to file…
Schoeps v. Museum of Modern ArtAlthough German law governs the issue of duress, the Claimants frame their substantive claims (originally,…