From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoenfeld v. Bloomingdale's Dept. Stores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.).


Plaintiff asserts that she settled the instant action upon a mistake of fact originating with defendants' counsel, namely that the settlement amount of $7500 would not be subject to general creditor status in the bankruptcy proceedings involving defendant Bloomingdale's parent company. While this error might provide a basis for vacating the settlement agreement, it was never represented that payment would be made by respondent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Bloomingdale's insurer, nor was the settlement made on behalf of Liberty Mutual. Under these circumstances, plaintiff's motion to add Liberty Mutual as a party-defendant and to compel it to pay the settlement was properly denied.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Schoenfeld v. Bloomingdale's Dept. Stores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Schoenfeld v. Bloomingdale's Dept. Stores

Case Details

Full title:JODY SCHOENFELD, Appellant, v. BLOOMINGDALE'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
581 N.Y.S.2d 322