From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoenblum v. Done Wright Motors

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 12, 2024
No. A24A0894 (Ga. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2024)

Opinion

A24A0894

02-12-2024

JOEL SCHOENBLUM v. DONE WRIGHT MOTORS et al.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

This case began in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, plaintiff Joel Schoenblum appealed to the superior court, which issued a final judgment in favor of the defendants. Following the denial of his motion for a new trial, Schoenblum appealed directly to this Court. We lack jurisdiction.

Appeals from superior court decisions reviewing lower court decisions must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), (b); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga.App. 874, 875 (581 S.E.2d 333) (2003). "Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional." Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga.App. 257, 257 (471 S.E.2d 60) (1996). Schoenblum's failure to follow the proper procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Schoenblum v. Done Wright Motors

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 12, 2024
No. A24A0894 (Ga. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Schoenblum v. Done Wright Motors

Case Details

Full title:JOEL SCHOENBLUM v. DONE WRIGHT MOTORS et al.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 12, 2024

Citations

No. A24A0894 (Ga. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2024)