From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 9, 2010
389 F. App'x 993 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-3297.

August 9, 2010.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in AT0831090378-I-1.

David U. Fierst, Stein, Mitchell Muse L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

Stephanie M. Conley, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were James M. Eisenmann, General Counsel, and Keisha Dawn Bell, Deputy General Counsel.

Jane W. Vanneman, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Kirk T. Manhardt, Assistant Director.

RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT


THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 9, 2010
389 F. App'x 993 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Case Details

Full title:Patricia SCHOEMAN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 9, 2010

Citations

389 F. App'x 993 (Fed. Cir. 2010)