From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoby v. Pinkerton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-0582 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0582 JFM (PC)

01-10-2012

WILLIE SCHOBY, Plaintiff, v. P. PINKERTON, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action. On December 19, 2011, plaintiff filed his third request for the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff's previous requests were filed on March 29, 2010 and August 24, 2011. All requests were denied. In light of those orders, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's December 19, 2011 request is denied.

On January 9, 2012, defendants filed an opposition to plaintiff's motion. Pursuant to this court's April 23, 2010 and October 18, 2010 orders, opposition to this type of motion should only be filed in this action if directed by the court. See Orders filed April 23, 2010 and October 18, 2010, at ¶ 7. The court did not order defendants to respond to plaintiff's motion and has not considered defendants' opposition in making the instant order.

____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12/md;scho0582.31.thr


Summaries of

Schoby v. Pinkerton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-0582 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Schoby v. Pinkerton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE SCHOBY, Plaintiff, v. P. PINKERTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0582 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)