From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schnitz v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jun 25, 1996
666 N.E.2d 919 (Ind. 1996)

Opinion

No. 34S02-9507-CR-899.

June 25, 1996.

Appeal from the Howard Circuit Court, The Honorable R. Alan Brubaker, Judge; Cause No. 34C01-9005-CF-56.

John Pinnow, Greenwood, for Appellant.

Pamela Carter, Attorney General, Jodi Kathryn Rowe, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, for Appellee.


The Court of Appeals held in this appeal that the State need not prove that a cocaine dealer knew that he committed his crime within 1000 feet of a school in order to convict the dealer of dealing in cocaine as a class A felony, Ind.Code Ann. § 35-48-4-1 (West Supp. 1990). Schnitz v. State, 650 N.E.2d 717 (Ind.Ct.App. 1995). We granted transfer to consider this question alongside the appeal in Walker v. State, 668 N.E.2d 243 (Ind. 1996).

For the reasons explained in Walker v. State, we summarily affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case. Ind. Appellate Rule 11 (B)(3).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

DICKSON and SELBY, JJ., concur.

DeBRULER, J., dissents without separate opinion.


for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Walker v. State, 668 N.E.2d 243 (Ind. 1996).


Summaries of

Schnitz v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jun 25, 1996
666 N.E.2d 919 (Ind. 1996)
Case details for

Schnitz v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH SCHNITZ, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT BELOW), v. STATE OF INDIANA…

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Jun 25, 1996

Citations

666 N.E.2d 919 (Ind. 1996)

Citing Cases

Jones v. State

Here, Singletary admitted to selling Officer Jones crack cocaine from the bedroom window of the house at 7:30…