From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schnitt v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 11, 2016
189 So. 3d 772 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D15–4638.

03-11-2016

Todd SCHNITT and Michelle Schnitt, Petitioners, v. SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP; and C. Phillip Campbell, Esquire, Respondents.

Will H. Florin, Thomas D. Roebig, Jr., and Eric Czelusta of Florin Roebig, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Petitioners. Stacy D. Blank and Joseph H. Varner, III, of Holland and Knight LLP, Tampa, for Respondents.


Will H. Florin, Thomas D. Roebig, Jr., and Eric Czelusta of Florin Roebig, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Petitioners.

Stacy D. Blank and Joseph H. Varner, III, of Holland and Knight LLP, Tampa, for Respondents.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

VILLANTI, C.J., and SILBERMAN and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Schnitt v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 11, 2016
189 So. 3d 772 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Schnitt v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

Case Details

Full title:Todd SCHNITT and Michelle Schnitt, Petitioners, v. SHUMAKER, LOOP …

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Mar 11, 2016

Citations

189 So. 3d 772 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
2016 WL 937313