From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schnibbe v. Glenz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, and new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. In our opinion the judgment is against the weight of the evidence. Upon a retrial more detailed proof should be presented to make it readily determinable whether or not the restrictive covenant is violated. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schnibbe v. Glenz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Schnibbe v. Glenz

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN SCHNIBBE and Others, Appellants, v. FRED GLENZ and KATIE GLENZ, His…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)