From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneidman v. Tollman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2001
279 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 9, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered May 18, 2000, which denied defendants-appellants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Williams, Tom, Friedman, JJ..

Mark C. Zauderer, for plaintiffs-appellants.


The motion court properly held that plaintiffs have standing to interpose their amended complaint, since their individual claims are separate and independent from a claim on behalf of the partnership (see,MK W. St. Co. v. Meridien Hotels, 184 A.D.2d 312, 313). The motion court also properly found that plaintiffs' amended pleadings were not time-barred, since they relate back to the original complaint, merely adding "additional factual detail" (see, State of New York v. St. James Nursing Home, 128 A.D.2d 694, 695).


Summaries of

Schneidman v. Tollman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2001
279 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Schneidman v. Tollman

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SCHNEIDMAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. STANLEY TOLLMAN, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 827

Citing Cases

O'Halloran v. Metro. Transp. Auth.

To be sure, plaintiff's original complaint did not allege the specific facts that she is a lesbian, that…