From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Sobina

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-30 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-30 Erie.

March 3, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on February 11, 2009, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, filed on March 17, 2009 (ECF No. 4), recommending that leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.

The parties were allowed until April 3, 2009 to file objections. No Objections were filed. Petitioner paid the filing fee on April 16, 2009. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation and objections thereto, we adopt Magistrate Judge Baxter's March 17, 2009 R R as the Opinion of the Court.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2011, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that said Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. Petitioner's leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is hereby DENIED.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Sobina

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-30 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Schneider v. Sobina

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILLIAM SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND J. SOBINA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 3, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-30 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2011)