From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Randolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

April, 1930.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ. Upon reargument of appeal the decision handed down on March 14, 1930, is amended to read as follows: Judgment entered upon the report of official referee reversed upon the law, without costs, without prejudice to the petitioner, respondent, to apply to the Special Term for confirmation of the report of the official referee. It seems that, in a proceeding of this kind, the court must determine the controversy and a reference is merely for the purpose of assisting the court, the referee having no power to hear and determine. (See Matter of Cartier v. Spooner, 118 App. Div. 342; Sullivan v. McCann, 124 id. 126.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

See 228 App. Div. 839. — [REP.


Motion for reargument of motion denied. Motion for reargument of appeal granted.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Randolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Schneider v. Randolph

Case Details

Full title:MARK HENRY SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff, v. ANTONIO D. MELGAREJO RANDOLPH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)