From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona
Nov 4, 1966
419 P.2d 738 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 1 CA-IC 95.

November 4, 1966.

Writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of award of the Industrial Commission. The Court of Appeals, Donofrio, J., held that evidence supported refusal of Industrial Commission to award compensation to claimant.

Award affirmed.

Gorey Ely by Stephen S. Gorey, Phoenix, for petitioner.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel by Joyce Volts, Phoenix, for respondents.


The record of The Industrial Commission in relation to the petitioner's claim before that body has been brought to us by a Writ of Certiorari for the purpose of review. The record reflects a series of unsuccessful efforts on the part of the petitioner to secure compensation. Petitioner did not employ an attorney to represent him until the matter had been determined. There is little to indicate that had petitioner obtained the services of an attorney at the inception of the proceedings that the result would have been different. Our review of the record persuades us that the award is to be affirmed.

The award is affirmed.

STEVENS, C.J., and CAMERON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona
Nov 4, 1966
419 P.2d 738 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Schneider v. Industrial Commission

Case Details

Full title:Sam SCHNEIDER, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona and…

Court:Court of Appeals of Arizona

Date published: Nov 4, 1966

Citations

419 P.2d 738 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966)
419 P.2d 738