From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Ferguson

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
May 23, 2007
CV 305-158 (S.D. Ga. May. 23, 2007)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

granting summary judgment to defendants on RLUIPA claim because “there is no evidence in the record that [the prison] received ‘Federal financial assistance’ for the programs and activities in question”

Summary of this case from Kramer v. Conway
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

CV 305-158.

May 23, 2007

ORDER

LISA WOOD, District Judge

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 66) is GRANTED, judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Defendants, and this civil action shall be CLOSED.

SO ORDERED.

Summaries of

Schneider v. Ferguson

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
May 23, 2007
CV 305-158 (S.D. Ga. May. 23, 2007)

granting summary judgment to defendants on RLUIPA claim because “there is no evidence in the record that [the prison] received ‘Federal financial assistance’ for the programs and activities in question”

Summary of this case from Kramer v. Conway

granting summary judgment to defendants on RLUIPA claim because "there is no evidence in the record that [the prison] received 'Federal financial assistance' for the programs and activities in question"

Summary of this case from Kramer v. Conway

In Schneider v. Ferguson, 77 Tex. 572, the property involved was described as "a stock of goods, consisting of salt, coal oil, apricots in cans, bottles of extract of vanilla, bottles of chowchow, starch, black pepper, cinnamon bark, pipes, cloves, cinnamon pulverized, cayenne pepper, cans of tea, cloves, boxes of stove polish, saucers, powder in cans, cups, ropes, lamp burners, lamp wicks, buckets, sugar, empty barrels, and various other kinds of goods usually kept by a retail grocer.

Summary of this case from Pacific Express Co. v. Needham
Case details for

Schneider v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:FRED SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D. FERGUSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: May 23, 2007

Citations

CV 305-158 (S.D. Ga. May. 23, 2007)

Citing Cases

Pacific Express Co. v. Needham

The defendant was entitled to know by allegation in plaintiff's petition the kind of nursery stock plaintiff…

Wolf v. Sahm

A judgment which appears upon its face to have been regularly rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction…

19 Citing Cases