From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. City of East Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 13, 1986
103 N.J. 115 (N.J. 1986)

Opinion

Argued October 21, 1985 —

Decided March 13, 1986.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Alan R. Hammer argued the cause for appellants ( Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer Gladstone, attorneys; Alan R. Hammer and Michael Pesce, of counsel; Michael Pesce and Daniel Keough, on the brief).

Saul A. Wolfe argued the cause for the respondent ( Skoloff and Wolfe, attorneys; Saul A. Wolfe, of counsel; Robert F. Giancaterino, on the brief).

Harry Haushalter, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the intervenor ( Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Harry Haushalter, on the brief).


The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaynor, reported at 196 N.J. Super. 587 (1984).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Schneider v. City of East Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 13, 1986
103 N.J. 115 (N.J. 1986)
Case details for

Schneider v. City of East Orange

Case Details

Full title:W.J. SCHNEIDER AND K.B. MARCUS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF EAST…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 13, 1986

Citations

103 N.J. 115 (N.J. 1986)
510 A.2d 1118

Citing Cases

Muscarelle v. Saddle Brook TP

The requirement that taxes be paid for the Tax Court to have jurisdiction over the contest of a local…

Jantzen v. Green Twp.

However, with added assessments (as well as omitted assessments), the failure to strictly adhere to…