From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Barash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 1991
170 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 21, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.).


Defendant's dilatory tactics over a four year period and his noncompliance with three court orders compelling disclosure of certain documents, resulting in the unavailability of those documents, justified the imposition of sanctions pursuant to CPLR 3126. Defendant provided no justifiable excuse for his delay in obtaining copies of the bank statements from the respective banks. These bank statements were relevant and probative of the central issue of where defendant maintained his primary residence.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Barash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 1991
170 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Schneider v. Barash

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SCHNEIDER, Respondent, v. DOROTHY BARASH, Defendant, and STANLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
566 N.Y.S.2d 39

Citing Cases

Vandelli v. Vandelli

Despite repeated demands by the plaintiff husband, motion practice, court orders, and conferencing with the…

Pycior v. New Line Structures, Inc.

A conditional order of preclusion is warranted when noncompliance with prior court orders results in the…