From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneble v. Florida

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 298 (1968)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.

No. 1070, Misc.

Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 201 So.2d 881, vacated and remanded.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).


Summaries of

Schneble v. Florida

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 298 (1968)
Case details for

Schneble v. Florida

Case Details

Full title:SCHNEBLE ET AL. v . FLORIDA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 10, 1968

Citations

392 U.S. 298 (1968)

Citing Cases

Schneble v. Florida

This Court vacated and remanded the case for further consideration in the light of Bruton v. United States,…

United States v. Belle

As recently as 1972, the Supreme Court suggested the possibility that linkage testimony may, in a particular…