From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmoldt v. Chicago Stone Setting Company

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Nov 4, 1943
320 Ill. App. 489 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,648. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed November 4, 1943

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS, § 348.1admissibility in rebuttal of evidence of consideration. In action against corporate maker of promissory note by its alleged purchaser from one to whom note had been executed allegedly in payment for services rendered, wherein officer of maker testified, in effect, that there was no consideration for note, held that certain parts of maker's original journal and ledger, which plaintiff offered in evidence, were admissible in rebuttal of officer's testimony.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. PETER H. SCHWABA, Judge, presiding.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the April term, 1943.

Perry B. Brelin, for appellant;

Lawrence E. Fleishman and Abraham Greenfield, for appellees.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed November 4, 1943.


Summaries of

Schmoldt v. Chicago Stone Setting Company

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Nov 4, 1943
320 Ill. App. 489 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)
Case details for

Schmoldt v. Chicago Stone Setting Company

Case Details

Full title:Elmer E. Schmoldt, Appellant, v., Chicago Stone Setting Company et al.…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Nov 4, 1943

Citations

320 Ill. App. 489 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)
51 N.E.2d 615