From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmitt v. Weber

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Aug 1, 1908
60 Misc. 361 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1908)

Opinion

August, 1908.

Eustis Foster, for plaintiff.

Simpson, Werner Cardoza, for defendants.


The court has no power arbitrarily to fix a minimum price at which the property owned in common by the parties to the action shall be sold at auction without the consent of all. The right to the distribution of the proceeds of sale, where actual partition is not directed, is incidental to the ownership of the property, and the statute does not, directly or by inference, confer power on the court to restrict the sale to a certain price. The market price is to be measured by what is bid for the property at public sale, upon due notice, and if the court should adopt the value placed upon it by one or any of the parties as a minimum price the distribution might well be delayed for an indefinite number of years. The motion will be granted so far as to permit the parties in interest to become purchasers at the sale and to have their shares applied upon the purchase price; otherwise denied.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Schmitt v. Weber

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Aug 1, 1908
60 Misc. 361 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1908)
Case details for

Schmitt v. Weber

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES J. SCHMITT, Plaintiff, v . JOHN WEBER et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Aug 1, 1908

Citations

60 Misc. 361 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1908)
113 N.Y.S. 449

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Mundy

The rule in equity is: "A party must stand or fall by the case made by his bill." Troup v. Hunter, 300 Ill.…

Jackson Hotel Bldg. Corp. v. Dunlap Hotel Co.

Defendant in error cannot make one case by its bill and another by its proof. ( Lang v. Metzger, 206 Ill.…