Schmidt v. Summit Funding, Inc.

Full title: DEAN SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. SUMMIT FUNDING, INC., et al, Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 22, 2017

Civ. No. 6:15-cv-0640-TC (D. Or. Mar. 22, 2017)

Opinion

Civ. No. 6:15-cv-0640-TC

03-22-2017

DEAN SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. SUMMIT FUNDING, INC., et al, Defendants.

MCSHANE, Judge

OPINION and ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 76) and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude it is correct.

Therefore, Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 76) is adopted in its entirety. This action is remanded to the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Lane. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge