From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Schmidt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 3, 2013
105 A.D.3d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-3

Michael T. SCHMIDT, appellant, v. Josephine M. SCHMIDT, respondent.


Golden Hirschhorn LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Lisa M. Golden of counsel), for appellant.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.H.O.), entered July 28, 2011, which, upon a decision of the same court dated November 29, 2010, made after a nonjury trial, inter alia, equitably distributed the marital property.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in permitting the defendant, at trial, to present certain testimony and evidence relating to financial issues.

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly calculated the defendant's share of the appreciation in the value of the marital residence over the course of the marriage ( see Jones v. Jones, 92 A.D.3d 845, 847, 939 N.Y.S.2d 510;Mongelli v. Mongelli, 68 A.D.3d 1070, 1072, 892 N.Y.S.2d 471;Kilkenny v. Kilkenny, 54 A.D.3d 816, 818–819, 863 N.Y.S.2d 807).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, CHAMBERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Schmidt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 3, 2013
105 A.D.3d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Schmidt

Case Details

Full title:Michael T. SCHMIDT, appellant, v. Josephine M. SCHMIDT, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2235
961 N.Y.S.2d 793