Opinion
Argued April 11, 1893
Decided May 5, 1893
Esek Cowen and John J. Adams for appellant.
S. Hanford for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Schmidt v. Garfield National Bank
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 5, 1893
33 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Schmidt v. Garfield National Bank
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 5, 1893
33 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Schmidt v. Garfield National Bank
Case Details
Full title:CHRISTIAN A. SCHMIDT, Respondent, v . THE GARFIELD NATIONAL BANK, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 5, 1893
Citations
33 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1893)
138 N.Y. 631
Citing Cases
Sparks v. Bank of Georgia
First observing that the plaintiff did nothing to deceive or mislead the defendant (as in Roberts v. Davis,…
Singer, c., Co. v. Citizens Nat. Bk., EnglewoodThere is a presumption against the validity of the transaction. Schmidt v. Garfield National Bank, 64…