From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Crews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Apr 22, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT

04-22-2013

DAN SCHMIDT, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D CREWS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 5, 2013. (Doc. 98). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1) and petitioner has done so, Docs. 100 & 101. I have made a de novo determination of the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation, and I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Respondents' motions to dismiss (docs. 23, 35) are DENIED.
3. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 57) is DENIED.
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

______________________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Crews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Apr 22, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:DAN SCHMIDT, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D CREWS, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Apr 22, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2013)