From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Crews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT

01-15-2013

DAN SCHMIDT, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D CREWS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Docs. 71 and 77, in which petitioner objects to the Magistrate Judge's orders at Docs. 59 and 73. Both orders were entered on "Referral & Order" forms and thus do not contain the Magistrate Judge's reasoning. In order to allow the undersigned to consider the objections, the orders at Doc. 59 and 73 are vacated, and the Magistrate Judge is directed to issue an order on those issues which explains the reasons for denying petitioner's motions. If the petitioner disagrees with that order, he must again file objections.

______________________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Crews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:DAN SCHMIDT, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D CREWS, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2013)