From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01950-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01950-AP

10-19-2012

DARLEEN S. SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : TERESA H. ABBOTT Law Office of Teresa Abbott, P.C. For Defendant : JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Civil Chief, U.S. Attorney's Office District of Colorado J. BENEDICT GARCIA Assistant U.S. Attorney ALEXESS D. REA Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel, SSA


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

For Plaintiff:

TERESA H. ABBOTT

Law Office of Teresa Abbott, P.C.

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

KEVIN TRASKOS

Civil Chief, U.S. Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

J. BENEDICT GARCIA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ALEXESS D. REA

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel, SSA

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 07/26/2012 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 08/14/2012 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 10/05/2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

Plaintiff states: That the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate. Defendant states: That the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Plaintiff states: None anticipated. Defendant states: None anticipated.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

There are no unusual claims or defenses in this case.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 12/04/2012 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 01/04/2013 C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 01/18/2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D. C.Colo.L.Civ.R. 7.1(c) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the moving attorney's client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

For Plaintiff:

______________________

TERESA H. ABBOTT

Law Office of Teresa Abbott, P.C.

Attorney for Plaintiff

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

KEVIN TRASKOS

Civil Chief, U.S. Attorney's

Office

District of Colorado

J. BENEDICT GARCIA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

______________________

ALEXESS D. REA

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel,

SSA

Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01950-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DARLEEN S. SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01950-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)