From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidli v. Pearce

California Court of Appeals, Third District, San Joaquin
Nov 5, 2009
No. C058270 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2009)

Opinion


Page 1019b

178 Cal.App.4th 1019b __ Cal.Rptr.3d__ NANCY A. SCHMIDLI et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. RODNEY K. PEARCE et al., Defendants and Appellants. C058270 California Court of Appeal, Third District, San Joaquin November 5, 2009

Super. Ct. No. CV030409

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 13, 2009 (178 Cal.App.4th 305; ___Cal.Rptr.3d ___).], be modified as follows:

The first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 18 [178 Cal.App.4th 316, advance report, 3d full par., lines 1-3], shall be deleted. The following sentence shall be inserted in its place:

By codifying Ung, the Legislature clarified that a notice of default was not part of the record for purposes of determining the applicable statute of limitations under section 882.020.

This modification does not change the judgment.


Summaries of

Schmidli v. Pearce

California Court of Appeals, Third District, San Joaquin
Nov 5, 2009
No. C058270 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Schmidli v. Pearce

Case Details

Full title:NANCY A. SCHMIDLI et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. RODNEY K. PEARCE…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, San Joaquin

Date published: Nov 5, 2009

Citations

No. C058270 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2009)