From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmid v. City of Petaluma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C11-05238 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C11-05238 CRB

11-17-2011

FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PETALUMA, DAVID GILMAN, ARTHUR FARINHA, NICHOLAS RACCANELLO, NICHOLAS McGOWAN, KEVIN SAVANO, COUNTY OF SONOMA, DOWNTOWN TOW, SCOTT STANFIELD AS DOE 50, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Defendants.

FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID, CSB NO. 96089 ATTORNEY AT LAW In Propia Persona


FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID, CSB NO. 96089

ATTORNEY AT LAW

In Propia Persona

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

CONCERNING THE 12(b)(6) MOTION OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AND SCOTT STANFIELD

Pursuant to the stipulation of the counsel for plaintiff FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID and counsel for defendants CITY OF PETALUMA and SCOTT STANFIELD pertaining to said defendants' 12(b)(6) motion, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's opposition to said defendants' 12(b)(6) motion is due on or before December 6, 2011 and the reply of said defendants, if any, shall be due on or before December 20, 2011.

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

Judge of the United States District


Summaries of

Schmid v. City of Petaluma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C11-05238 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Schmid v. City of Petaluma

Case Details

Full title:FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PETALUMA, DAVID GILMAN, ARTHUR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

No. C11-05238 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)