From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmalzl v. Peretta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Summary

holding that a mortgagee was not owed rents collected during foreclosure where they did not demand possession of the premises

Summary of this case from Nationstar Mortg. v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Elima Lani Condos.

Opinion

December, 1934.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Plaintiff moved for an order directing the respondent Hallinan, who is not a party to the action, to turn over to him, as mortgagee, rents collected by said Hallinan while he was acting as the agent of the owner of the equity of redemption. In our opinion the motion was properly denied because no receiver of rents was appointed in the action, the plaintiff never had possession of the mortgaged premises prior to the foreclosure sale, and there is not in the record satisfactory proof of a demand ever having been made by or on behalf of the plaintiff for possession of said premises. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schmalzl v. Peretta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

holding that a mortgagee was not owed rents collected during foreclosure where they did not demand possession of the premises

Summary of this case from Nationstar Mortg. v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Elima Lani Condos.
Case details for

Schmalzl v. Peretta

Case Details

Full title:OTTO P. SCHMALZL, Appellant, v. ROSE PERETTA, Sometimes Called and Known…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1934

Citations

243 App. Div. 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Nationstar Mortg. v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Elima Lani Condos.

The right to rents and profits may vest in a mortgagee, however, if ... the mortgagor defaults and the court…