From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schluter v. Malley

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 13, 2024
CV 23-36-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-36-TUC-JAS (LCK)

03-13-2024

Joel Arthur Schluter, Plaintiff, v. Martin O. Malley, Defendant.


ORDER

Honorable James A. Soto United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins' recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins' Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is accepted and adopted.

(2) This case is remanded for an award of benefits.

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case.


Summaries of

Schluter v. Malley

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 13, 2024
CV 23-36-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Schluter v. Malley

Case Details

Full title:Joel Arthur Schluter, Plaintiff, v. Martin O. Malley, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

CV 23-36-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2024)

Citing Cases

Troncao v. O'Malley

Indeed, courts often remand for immediate calculation of benefits when an ALJ reaches Step Five and fails to…