From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schlitz v. Craig

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 7, 2008
9:05-CV-1575 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2008)

Opinion

9:05-CV-1575 (LEK/VEB).

August 7, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on June 30, 2008, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 25).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Bianchini's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 25) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Schlitz's Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED, that no Certificate of Appealability shall issue with regard to any of Petitioner's claims; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schlitz v. Craig

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 7, 2008
9:05-CV-1575 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Schlitz v. Craig

Case Details

Full title:BRENDON SCHLITZ, Petitioner, v. T.S. CRAIG, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Aug 7, 2008

Citations

9:05-CV-1575 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2008)