From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schlicker v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
Case Number 10-13697 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number 10-13697

11-22-2011

DIANCE M. SCHLICKER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Honorable Thomas L. Ludington


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR REMAND, DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND REMANDING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

United States Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson issued a report and recommendation (ECF No. 20) on November 4, 2011, recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion for remand (ECF No. 11), deny Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19), and that, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner be remanded. Either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Michelson's report and recommendation (ECF No. 20) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for remand (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19) is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED for further consideration of Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits in accordance with the guidance provided by Judge Michelson's report and recommendation (ECF No. 20).

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE I


The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 22, 2011.

TRACY A. JACOBS


Summaries of

Schlicker v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
Case Number 10-13697 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Schlicker v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:DIANCE M. SCHLICKER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

Case Number 10-13697 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 22, 2011)

Citing Cases

Katona v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

And to the extent an ALJ determines that an identified impairment, severe or non-severe, does not result in…

Harper ex rel. Harper v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

However, to the extent an ALJ determines that an identified impairment, severe or otherwise, does not result…