From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schlegel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-2190 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-2190

02-10-2012

MATTHEW SCHLEGEL and JENNIFER SCHLEGEL, His Wife, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


ORDER

NOW, this 10th day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED. Attorney fees will be stricken from Count I, and paragraphs 25 and 28 will be stricken from Count II as impermissible claims under Pennsylvania's Unfair Insurance Practice Act, 40 Pa. C.S.A. § 1171.1 et seq. Counts II and III will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
(2) Plaintiffs are given twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to submit an amended complaint as to Counts II and III.
(3) Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 6) is DENIED.

_____________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Schlegel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-2190 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Schlegel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW SCHLEGEL and JENNIFER SCHLEGEL, His Wife, Plaintiffs, v. STATE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 10, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-2190 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2012)

Citing Cases

Sowinski v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co.

In Palmisano, supra, the court found that allegations supporting the bad faith claim were insufficient where…

Rissinger v. State Farm Ins. Co.

These averments fail to state a claim for insurance bad faith. Courts have found similar allegations merely…