From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schlegel v. Muscarella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1938
254 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

May 25, 1938.

Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that no actionable negligence on the part of the defendant has been shown. ( De Neef v. Price, 249 App. Div. 924.) All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance, and Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial. (The County Court judgment affirms a judgment for plaintiff, of the Justice Court of the town of Webster, in an automobile negligence action.


Summaries of

Schlegel v. Muscarella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1938
254 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Schlegel v. Muscarella

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SCHLEGEL, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of JOHN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 25, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)