From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schlatre v. Marathon Dig. Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 3, 2022
2:21-cv-2209-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2209-RFB-NJK

01-03-2022

TAD SCHLATRE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. MARATHON DIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC. f/k/a MARATHON PATENT GROUP, INC., MERRICK D. OKAMOTO, FREDERICK G. THIEL, and SIMEON SALZMAN, Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER [DOCKET NO. 6]

1. The Motion to Withdraw the Attorney Appearance of J. Alexander Hood II is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to remove J. Alexander Hood II from the docket.

3. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to remove J. Alexander Hood II from the ECF notice list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schlatre v. Marathon Dig. Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 3, 2022
2:21-cv-2209-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Schlatre v. Marathon Dig. Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TAD SCHLATRE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-2209-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2022)

Citing Cases

Bernard v. Thiel

3. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a consolidated complaint 30 days after an amended complaint is filed…