From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schiskey v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 2, 2014
Case No. 3:14 CV 00408-TC (D. Or. Sep. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14 CV 00408-TC

09-02-2014

ROBERT SCHISKEY, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on August 7, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co.. Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist, 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 2 day of September, 2014.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Schiskey v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 2, 2014
Case No. 3:14 CV 00408-TC (D. Or. Sep. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Schiskey v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SCHISKEY, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 2, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:14 CV 00408-TC (D. Or. Sep. 2, 2014)