From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schinzel v. Tate

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jun 3, 2015
No. 04-15-00158-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 3, 2015)

Opinion

No. 04-15-00158-CV

06-03-2015

Sandy SCHINZEL, Appellant v. Charles G. TATE, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2015CV000835
Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant filed a notice of appeal March 23, 2015, stating that she intended to appeal from the trial court's judgment signed on March 19, 2015. However, the trial court clerk has informed the clerk of this court that there is currently no final judgment in the cause. Indeed, from the motion for emergency relief filed by appellant on March 26, 2015 (and subsequently denied by this court), it appears that the justice of the peace signed a writ of possession in a suit to evict appellant and appellant has appealed to the county court. From appellant's motion, it appears her appeal may still be pending in the county court. If there is no final judgment signed by the county court, this court has no jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Therefore, on April 27, 2015, we ordered appellant to show cause by May 7, 2015, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has not responded. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Schinzel v. Tate

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jun 3, 2015
No. 04-15-00158-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Schinzel v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:Sandy SCHINZEL, Appellant v. Charles G. TATE, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jun 3, 2015

Citations

No. 04-15-00158-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 3, 2015)