From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schiming v. Crews

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 2, 2014
139 So. 3d 887 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC13–1799.

2014-04-2

Ronald SCHIMING, Petitioner(s) v. Michael D. CREWS, etc., Respondent(s).


The “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Alternatively, All Writs Petition” is hereby dismissed because this Court generally will not consider the repetitive petitions of persons who have abused the judicial processes of the lower courts such that they have been barred from filing certain actions there. See Pettway v. State, 776 So.2d 930, 931 (Fla.2000).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schiming v. Crews

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 2, 2014
139 So. 3d 887 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Schiming v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:Ronald SCHIMING, Petitioner(s) v. Michael D. CREWS, etc., Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 2, 2014

Citations

139 So. 3d 887 (Fla. 2014)

Citing Cases

Schiming v. Jones

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.SeeSchiming v. Jones ,…