Opinion
January 22, 1963
Judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered April 6, 1961, unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent (see Williams v. State of New York, 9 A.D.2d 415, affd. 8 N.Y.2d 886). The court is of course bound by the determination in plaintiff's habeas corpus proceeding ( People ex rel. Siegal v. Dros, 11 N.Y.2d 167).
Concur — Breitel, J.P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.