Schiff v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

5 Citing cases

  1. Larsen v. PTT, LLC

    3:18-cv-05275-TMC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 11, 2024)

    5) a causal link between the unfair or deceptive act or practice and the injury. Schiff v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2 Wn.3d 762, 771, 542 P.3d 1002 (2024).

  2. Vandervert Constr. v. Allied World Specialty Ins. Co.

    No. 23-35248 (9th Cir. Sep. 19, 2024)

    Vandervert has forfeited any challenge to the district court's dispositive finding that no harm resulted from the alleged regulatory violations. See Schiff v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 542 P.3d 1002, 1006 (Wash. 2024) (harm required for CPA claim); P.E.L. v. Premera Blue Cross, 540 P.3d 105, 124 (Wash. 2023) (harm required for bad faith claim).

  3. Culver v. 3M Co.

    24-5119 DGE-RJB (W.D. Wash. May. 20, 2024)

    Under the first element, “unfair or deceptive act or practice,” a “claim under the Washington CPA may be predicated upon a per se violation of statute, an act or practice that has the capacity to deceive substantial portions of the public, or an unfair or deceptive act or practice not regulated by statute but in violation of public interest.” Schiff v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 542 P.3d 1002, 1006 (Wash. 2024)(internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

  4. Mounce v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co.

    2:22-cv-1720 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 25, 2024)

    While “[t]he injury element under the CPA is broadly defined,” it still requires “proof the plaintiff's property interest or money [were] diminished because of the unlawful conduct even if the expenses caused by the statutory violation are minimal.” Folweiler Chiropractic, PS v. Am. Fam. Ins. Co., 429 P.3d 813, 819 (Wash.Ct.App. 2018), abrogated by Schiff v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 542 P.3d 1002 (Wash. 2024); Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Wash., 204 P.3d 885, 899 (Wash. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). Mounce's entire injury theory presumes he is owed the subrogation funds, but whether he is owed anything is very much in dispute.

  5. Wren v. Whitehead

    No. 58269-4-II (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 4, 2025)

    We review summary judgment rulings de novo and engage in the same inquiry as the trial court. Schiff v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2 Wn.3d 762, 769, 542 P.3d 1002 (2024).