From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schiff v. Hurwitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 1, 2012
12cv0264 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2012)

Opinion

12cv0264

10-01-2012

RAE SCHIFF, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS J. HURWITZ, M.D., ET AL., Defendants.


ELECTRONICALLY FILED


Order on Motion to Compel

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions (doc. no. 91), and Defendant's Response thereto (doc. no. 92), said Motion is GRANTED.

Defendant, Dennis J. Hurwitz, M.D. shall, by October 8, 2012, amend his Answers to the following Requests for Admissions, specifying the basis for his denial or reason why he cannot unqualifiedly admit the Request: Request Numbers 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 21, 40, 66, 67, 69, 70, 72, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81, 82 and 84.

Additionally, Defendant, Dennis J. Hurwitz, MD shall, by October 8, 2012, amend his Answers to the following Requests for Admissions where he has entered an improper objection by fully and completely responding to the Request: Request Numbers 3, 25 and 86.

Should Dr. Hurwitz fail to fully comply with the terms of this Order, Plaintiff shall file another Motion and the Court will take under advisement the Motion and whether the above Request for Admission(s) set forth in this Order shall be deemed admitted without qualification.

____________________

Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge
cc: All Registered ECF Counsel and Parties


Summaries of

Schiff v. Hurwitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 1, 2012
12cv0264 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Schiff v. Hurwitz

Case Details

Full title:RAE SCHIFF, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS J. HURWITZ, M.D., ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 1, 2012

Citations

12cv0264 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2012)