From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schick v. Levine

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 8, 1929
226 N.W. 220 (Mich. 1929)

Opinion

Docket No. 143, Calendar No. 34,212.

Submitted June 20, 1929.

Decided July 8, 1929.

Appeal from Wayne; Hart (Ray), J., presiding. Submitted June 20, 1929. (Docket No. 143, Calendar No. 34,212.) Decided July 8, 1929.

Bill in aid of execution by Mabel Schick against Louis Levine and another. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Nelson S. Shapero and James Segesta ( Shapero Shapero, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Isadore Starr, for defendants.


This is a bill in aid of execution to reach the claimed interest of defendant Louis Levine in property held by him and his wife, Sarah Levine, by the entireties. In the circuit the bill was dismissed and the case is here by appeal of plaintiff.

Plaintiff endeavored to make a case by calling defendant Louis Levine as a witness. Mr. Levine's testimony was to the effect that his wife paid the consideration for the property and this was also shown by Mrs. Levine's brother, an attorney, who was called as a witness by the defendants. Plaintiff invokes the statute, Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 12897, placing the burden of proof upon defendants to show that the holding of Mrs. Levine was in all respects bona fide and not as a trustee of the judgment debtor. The prima facie case of plaintiff, resting upon the fact of judgment and levy, "winked out" when the proof came into the case.

At one time Mr. Levine had an interest in some other property, but foreclosure before he became indebted to plaintiff cut it off.

In argument it was claimed that after such foreclosure and by reason of a promise a gift was made to the defendants. The record is not satisfactory upon this point. If such a gift, by other than her husband, was made to Mrs. Levine and enabled her to acquire the property in suit, and she consented to take title thereto in the names of herself and husband by the entireties, it was no fraud upon her husband's creditor.

It would be of no benefit to the profession to state the testimony.

Plaintiff failed to make a case and the decree in the circuit is affirmed, with costs to defendants.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, FELLOWS, CLARK, POTTER, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred. McDONALD, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

Schick v. Levine

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 8, 1929
226 N.W. 220 (Mich. 1929)
Case details for

Schick v. Levine

Case Details

Full title:SCHICK v. LEVINE

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 8, 1929

Citations

226 N.W. 220 (Mich. 1929)
226 N.W. 220

Citing Cases

Detroit S. Trust Co. v. Gitre

Plaintiffs made a prima facie case under 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14617, and the burden then rested on defendants…