From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schick v. Carrols Corp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Apr 29, 2022
4:20-CV-01422 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2022)

Opinion

4:20-CV-01422

04-29-2022

CYNTHIA SCHICK, Plaintiff, v. CARROLS CORPORATION t/a/d/b/a BURGER KING, Defendant, v. BEAUDETTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Third-Party Defendant, v. GBC DESIGN, INC., Third-Party Defendant.


ORDER

Matthew W. Brann, Chief United States District Judge.

AND NOW, this 29th day of April 2022, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Carrols Corporation's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 59) is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART, as follows:

a. DENIED as to Cynthia Schick's premises-liability claims involving the curb color and the lack of a handrail/guardrail.

b. GRANTED as to Schick's premises-liability claims involving door signs.

2. Beaudette Construction Company, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 57) is DENIED.

3. GBC Design, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 63) is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART, as follows:

a. DENIED as to Carrols's and Beaudette's claims for contribution.

b. GRANTED as to Beaudette's claims for indemnification.

4. A telephonic status conference will be scheduled by separate Order.


Summaries of

Schick v. Carrols Corp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Apr 29, 2022
4:20-CV-01422 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Schick v. Carrols Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA SCHICK, Plaintiff, v. CARROLS CORPORATION t/a/d/b/a BURGER KING…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 29, 2022

Citations

4:20-CV-01422 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2022)